Voter ID plans take center stage in election policy debates
BISMARCK, N.D. - Efforts to enact voting restrictions continue, months after the 2020 presidential election. Voter ID requirements are being floated in some cases, prompting a nonpartisan group in North Dakota to issue a cautionary tale.
One of North Dakota's two U.S. Senators recently stated he wants to require states that would mandate proof of vaccination to also adopt voter ID laws. At the state level, Nebraska's Legislature is debating a plan that calls for ID requirements for casting a ballot.
Supporters say it's a way to prevent fraud. But Rick Gion, communications and policy director of North Dakota Voters First, said a heavy-handed approach ends up causing more problems - and points to the state's own statute.
"It's still fairly strict, but it's not as strict as it used to be," said Gion. "I mean, it was very targeted and blatant."
He referred there to the hardships the North Dakota law placed on Native Americans, resulting in court settlements. The state now has to pay more than $450,000 to cover legal costs incurred by tribal nations that sued.
Gion said policymakers should focus on more pressing issues tied to elections, such as eliminating gerrymandering in redistricting.
Gion said it's reasonable to have an identification policy for someone to take part in the democratic process. But he argued some states have gone too far.
"It's just the level of what that identification is," said Gion. "How it inconveniences people, how it makes it harder to vote."
More than 35 states have some form of voter ID law. Backers of the stricter policies say in addition to preventing fraud, they help restore confidence in the election system.
But opponents contend tighter restrictions are a solution in search of a problem, and that they create extra costs and burdens for election administrators.